Thursday, March 25, 2010

San Diego Clairemont Area Median House Prices thru Feb 2010

Greetings All Bloggers! 

 

The latest in San Diego SOLD home prices through Feb '10.

 

For HOUSES in the 18 different zip codes which I track, the median sold prices look like:  

Ø  Compared to 1 mo ago, 55% of our zips either went up in market value or stayed essentially the same (within +/-5% market value). South Park / Golden Hill  leads this pack with a 32% increase over values of the prior month.

Ø  Compared to 2 mos ago, the market value of 61% are still either a higher value or stayed essentially the same (within +/-5%) as they were 2 mos ago. South Park / Golden Hill  had a 42% increase and North Park had a 38% increase over the previous 2 mo period.  And, 39% of zips have shown an increase or stayed the same in market value for the past 2 mos straight.

Ø  Compared to 1 year ago, we have 72% with a market value either higher in market value or essentially the same (within +/-5%) compared to 1 yr ago. Here we have South Park / Golden Hill with a 48% increase over market values of 1 yr ago.

 

To summarize:  Considering this season is winter and we should see a dip in prices during the winter months, we actually are holding our own very nicely in San Diego. For both condos and houses, over 1/2 of our select zip codes show NO decline in market values for the month of Feb!  The below chart makes this NO-DECLINE in market value easy to see: 

FEB 2010

CONDOS

HOUSES

1 MO AGO

54%

55%

2 MO AGO

54%

61%

1 YR AGO

69%

72%

Recently, someone asked me why I would go through the work of pulling this data myself from the MLS (Multiple Listing Service) for San Diego county ........ why not use the data from the major data collecting organizations in San Diego?  Simple answer - accuracy!  I just plain found too many mistakes in their data and I want data I can trust to pass on to my clients with confidence.  After several mistakes came to light, the tipping point was when they showed the "median price" of a particular zip code as $945,000, but, when I checked the San Diego county MLS, the San Diego county tax rolls and title company records, these all showed that the median price should have been around $495,000.  The data collecting agency input had inverted the first 2 numbers. This is a major statistical error in that it almost doubled the price for that month!  Not one home in that zip code had sold for anything close to their claim of $945,000.  So, for the sake of detailed accuracy in communicating and full confidence in what I say, I have opted to just pull the data every month myself. 

Now, in all fairness to these data collecting agencies, in my opinion, they are fine for a very broad overview of what is happening with San Diego real estate, but if you see a detail that just plain looks suspect to you or it doesn't seem to jive, check it out further or give me a call / send an email and I can easily & quickly verify how close to accurate it really is!  My data is designed to give you a very detailed viewpoint into those specific zip codes which are of interest to you.

Best - Peg
 

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

San Diego Tierrasanta Area Median House Prices thru Feb 2010

Greetings All Bloggers! 

 

The latest in San Diego SOLD home prices through Feb '10.

 

For HOUSES in the 18 different zip codes which I track, the median sold prices look like:  

Ø  Compared to 1 mo ago, 55% of our zips either went up in market value or stayed essentially the same (within +/-5% market value). South Park / Golden Hill  leads this pack with a 32% increase over values of the prior month.

Ø  Compared to 2 mos ago, the market value of 61% are still either a higher value or stayed essentially the same (within +/-5%) as they were 2 mos ago. South Park / Golden Hill  had a 42% increase and North Park had a 38% increase over the previous 2 mo period.  And, 39% of zips have shown an increase or stayed the same in market value for the past 2 mos straight.

Ø  Compared to 1 year ago, we have 72% with a market value either higher in market value or essentially the same (within +/-5%) compared to 1 yr ago. Here we have South Park / Golden Hill with a 48% increase over market values of 1 yr ago.

 

To summarize:  Considering this season is winter and we should see a dip in prices during the winter months, we actually are holding our own very nicely in San Diego. For both condos and houses, over 1/2 of our select zip codes show NO decline in market values for the month of Feb!  The below chart makes this NO-DECLINE in market value easy to see: 

FEB 2010

CONDOS

HOUSES

1 MO AGO

54%

55%

2 MO AGO

54%

61%

1 YR AGO

69%

72%

Recently, someone asked me why I would go through the work of pulling this data myself from the MLS (Multiple Listing Service) for San Diego county ........ why not use the data from the major data collecting organizations in San Diego?  Simple answer - accuracy!  I just plain found too many mistakes in their data and I want data I can trust to pass on to my clients with confidence.  After several mistakes came to light, the tipping point was when they showed the "median price" of a particular zip code as $945,000, but, when I checked the San Diego county MLS, the San Diego county tax rolls and title company records, these all showed that the median price should have been around $495,000.  The data collecting agency input had inverted the first 2 numbers. This is a major statistical error in that it almost doubled the price for that month!  Not one home in that zip code had sold for anything close to their claim of $945,000.  So, for the sake of detailed accuracy in communicating and full confidence in what I say, I have opted to just pull the data every month myself. 

Now, in all fairness to these data collecting agencies, in my opinion, they are fine for a very broad overview of what is happening with San Diego real estate, but if you see a detail that just plain looks suspect to you or it doesn't seem to jive, check it out further or give me a call / send an email and I can easily & quickly verify how close to accurate it really is!  My data is designed to give you a very detailed viewpoint into those specific zip codes which are of interest to you.

For more info on houses & condos in various San Diego zip codes and other real estate insights, check out any one of these below links:

Best - Peg

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

CA GOVERNOR SIGNS HOME BUYER TAX CREDIT LEGISLATION

CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®
Brought to you by the CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®


March 25, 2010
 
"...  late this afternoon, Gov. Schwarzenegger signed Assembly Bill 183, the Homebuyer Tax Credit legislation, into law. His actions today are the result of our efforts in Sacramento over the last several weeks as members and our team in the capital worked for the bill’s passage before it landed on the governor’s desk.

 

AB 183 will provide $200 million for home buyer tax credits, allocating $100 million for qualified first-time home buyers of existing homes and $100 million for purchasers of new, or previously unoccupied, homes. The eligible taxpayer who purchases a qualified personal residence on and after May 1, 2010, and on or before Dec. 31, 2010, or who purchases a qualified principal residence on and after Dec. 31, 2010, and before Aug. 1, 2011, pursuant to an enforceable contract executed on or before Dec. 31, 2010, will be able to take the allowed tax credit. The credit is equal to the lesser of 5 percent of the purchase price or $10,000, in equal installments over three consecutive years. Under AB 183, purchasers will be required to live in the home for at least two years or forfeit the credit (i.e., repay it to the state).

The positive impact of the federal home buyer tax credit is clear. Nearly 40 percent of first-time home buyers said they would not have purchased a home if the federal tax credit for first-time home buyers was not offered, according to C.A.R. research conducted last year.

 

The state’s previous home buyer tax credit program was so successful that it ran out of tax credits by the end of June 2009, eight months before it was set to expire and just as housing markets appeared to be turning a corner.  Unlike last year’s legislation, AB 183 adds a tax credit for the purchase of an existing home by a first-time home buyer ..."


Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

Monday, March 15, 2010

Default Borrowers Stay as Lenders Delay Evictions

courtesy of:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

(The Los Angeles Times)

Many borrowers in default stay put as lenders delay evictions

Despite being months behind, many strapped residents are hanging on to their homes, essentially living rent-free. Pressure on banks to modify loans and a glut of inventory are driving the trend.

February 27, 2010|By Alana Semuels

It's been 16 months since Eugene and Patricia Harrison last paid the mortgage on their Perris home. Eleven months since the notice got slapped on their front door, warning that it would be sold at auction.

 

A terse letter from a lawyer came eight months ago, telling them that their lender now owned the house. Three months later, the bank told them to pay up or get out by the end of the week.

Still, they remain in the yellow ranch-style home they bought seven years ago for $128,000, with its views of the San Jacinto Mountains. They're not planning on going anywhere.

"We're kind of on pins and needles, but who'd want to leave when you put this kind of energy into a house?" said Eugene Harrison, 70, gesturing toward a bucolic mural of mountains, stream and flowers the couple painted on the living room wall.

 

Throughout the country, people continue to default on their home loans -- but lenders have backed off on forced evictions, allowing many to remain in their homes, essentially rent-free.

Several factors are driving the trend, industry experts say, including government pressure on banks to modify loans and keep people in their homes.

 

And with a glut of inventory in places like Southern California's Inland Empire, Nevada and Arizona, lenders are loath to depress housing prices further by dumping more properties into a weak market.

Finally, allowing borrowers to stay in their homes helps protect the bank's investment as it negotiates with the homeowners, said Gary Kirshner, a spokesman for Chase bank, a major lender.

"If the person's in the property, there's less chance for vandalism, and they're probably maintaining the house," he said.

 

Economists say the situation won't last forever, but in the meantime the "amnesty" may allow at least some homeowners to regain their financial footing and avoid eviction.

 

In the Inland Empire, an estimated 100,000 homeowners are living rent-free, according to economist John Husing, who based that number on the difference between loan delinquencies and foreclosures. Industry experts say it's difficult to say how many families are in that situation nationally because only banks know for sure how many customers have stopped paying entirely.

 

But Rick Sharga of Irvine data tracker RealtyTrac notes that the number of loans in which the borrower hasn't made a payment in 90 days or more but is not in foreclosure is at 5.1% nationally, a record high. And yet the number of foreclosures last year was 2.9 million, below the 3.2 million that RealtyTrac economists predicted.

 

 

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

 

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

Saturday, March 13, 2010

What Is A Good Faith Estimate?

courtesy of:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

(The Los Angeles Times)

Shopping for a loan? A good faith estimate will protect you
Beginning Jan. 1, the Dept. of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) required lenders to issue Good Faith Estimates to protect consumers applying for mortgage loans.  Some loan officers, however, sidestep the new requirement by giving their initial quotes on informal worksheets that carry no federal consumer protections.  It is important that consumers understand the differences between the federally mandated good faith estimate form and a lender’s informal worksheet.

 

MAKING SENSE OF THE STORY FOR CONSUMERS

  • Last month, HUD told lenders and loan officers that under no circumstances can worksheet quotes be issued to a mortgage applicant in lieu of a good-faith-estimate form.

  • Under the new law, once a mortgage applicant supplies the essential application information, including Social Security number, property address, and estimated value, among other data, lenders must issue a binding-cost good-faith estimate.  Once this information is provided, lenders are required to issue the good faith estimate within three days of the application.

  • Loan officers cannot refuse to provide a good faith estimate to an applicant who requests one, nor can they tell applicants that they must commit to moving forward with their mortgage company to obtain a mortgage prior to receiving a good faith estimate.

  • Once an applicant has received a good faith estimate, they can take the form with them to comparison shop.  The new form includes itemized boxes allowing mortgage applicants to compare quotes from up to four lenders, such as interest rates, loan fees, prepayment penalties, and total settlement expenses.

  • The good faith estimate also ties upfront estimates to later charges at closing, and encourages borrowers to check line by line for any discrepancies.  The form explains which fees come with zero tolerance for changes between upfront estimates and closing—generally the lender’s own fees and local transfer taxes—and which fees allow a 10 percent fluctuation for changes higher than the estimate, such as certain title and closing-related services.

  • Some worksheets resemble good-faith estimates, but have titles such as “estimated settlement costs” at the top of the page.  Others indicate on the bottom of the form that the worksheet is not a good faith estimate, so consumers should carefully review documents before making any decisions.
     

To read the full story, please click here

 
 

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

 

 

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network

courtesy of:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

New Web site launched to prevent loan mod scams
The U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, in partnership with the Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network, launched PreventLoanScams.org, a new Web site to prevent loan modification scams.

The Loan Modification Scam Prevention Network developed the Web site to provide homeowners with a single destination to report alleged scammers. Complaints filed online are added to a national complaint database and forwarded to the appropriate law enforcement agencies for review. The Network estimates that the Web site will assist approximately 50,000 homeowners affected by scams. Additionally, HUD has directed its local fair housing and housing counseling grantees to begin reporting alleged loan modification scams via the Web site. 
 

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

 

 

Posted via email from RealtorPeg

Why CA Home Sellers Sold Their Home in 2008-2009

courtesy of:  CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS

C.A.R. releases “2009-2010 Survey of California Home Sellers”
Changes in family and employment status as well as adjustments to monthly mortgage obligations played significant roles in homeowners’ decisions to sell their homes in 2009, according to C.A.R.’s “2009-2010 Survey of California Home Sellers.”  According to the report, 67 percent of all sellers in California did so as a result of difficulties related to meeting their mortgage obligation. 

Sellers in 2009 cited difficulty meeting the monthly mortgage obligations (30 percent); job loss (18 percent); and “mortgage payment increased” (15 percent) as primary motivations to sell.  By comparison, in 2008, one in five sellers cited the ability to meet their mortgage payment obligations; while 11 percent sold due to financial difficulties. 
 

Mary "Peg" Heying
REALTOR® - CA DRE License # 01726709
Prudential CA Realty
2830 Shelter Island Dr.
San Diego, CA 92106
Cell:  (619) 301-8589

 

 

Posted via email from RealtorPeg